Not sure if I should do this but these are the SHA256 hash of the random generator seed for fairness purpose, the actual seed will be announced when we hit the target.
@tgl said:
FAT32 i think you got used to winning, i see you are trying to provide this backdoored code so you will win again
I am just trying to help, I can choose not to do so too. There might be complex mathematics and proofs to show that the algorithm is not equally distributed, but I don't think it is necessary to do so. I am quite skeptical about stuff so I always try to ensure fairness.
In addition, how can this be backdoored with few lines of codes? There's no known SHA256 collision yet, the seed is pre-determined even without knowing the upcoming users. In addition, the algorithm above depends on the latest registered user, how can I be sure who will be the X-th user?
If you insist on me winning something, feel free to take my VPS and enjoy your day.
Edit: I am not trying to start a drama here, but someone else choose to do so. I can tell you it is so much easier to fake a random.org than my algorithm. Self-sign a SSL certificate, point the IP to your own, and boom you can fake the result.
Comments
Oh, I like that one. Stealing!
@FreeBSD are you @jsg man?
Or @default ?
So... none of my 15 other accounts got flagged? ;-)
Edit: sorry for being totally irrelevant, I didn't notice I was on the first page of a 5 page thread...
Let me grab my tools.
That's looks like the perfect tool for a professional dominatrix servicing IT professionals.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
CAT5 of 9 tails
Get the best deal on your next VPS or Shared/Reseller hosting from RacknerdTracker.com - The original aff garden.
will cociu put the Black Friday offer here?
Every Friday is a Black Friday for @cociu
#dicks
My pronouns are asshole/asshole/asshole. I will give you the same courtesy.
Works best, if those RJ45 Connectors are snipped before use.
And some sisters too.
so whats the update on this? lol.
Sorry
Been busy with
292 users.
https://inceptionhosting.com
Please do not use the PM system here for Inception Hosting support issues.
@FAT32 are we having a lucky draw soon?
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
@poisson if FAT32 wins again, its rigged
I have been out some days ... do we have a winner ?
If cociu wins it is even more rigged.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Not sure if I should do this but these are the SHA256 hash of the random generator seed for fairness purpose, the actual seed will be announced when we hit the target.
This is the code to select a random user:
When the function above is called,
username
will be populated with the user with ID at the upper bound of the range.For example, to select a winner for Round 3, the function call will be
selectWinner('some_seed', 'username_of_the_user_with_id_500', 500)
"Humanity is f*cked up" - Jay
@AnthonySmith
https://www.random.org/
and record yourself with todays newspaper in your hand while doing it
@FAT32 i think you got used to winning, i see you are trying to provide this backdoored code so you will win again
I have never won a draw in my whole life.
Action and Reaction in history
I am just trying to help, I can choose not to do so too. There might be complex mathematics and proofs to show that the algorithm is not equally distributed, but I don't think it is necessary to do so. I am quite skeptical about stuff so I always try to ensure fairness.
In addition, how can this be backdoored with few lines of codes? There's no known SHA256 collision yet, the seed is pre-determined even without knowing the upcoming users. In addition, the algorithm above depends on the latest registered user, how can I be sure who will be the X-th user?
If you insist on me winning something, feel free to take my VPS and enjoy your day.
Edit: I am not trying to start a drama here, but someone else choose to do so. I can tell you it is so much easier to fake a random.org than my algorithm. Self-sign a SSL certificate, point the IP to your own, and boom you can fake the result.
"Humanity is f*cked up" - Jay
He was just doing the art of $hitposting
Really ?
@FAT32 it seems you do not speak sarcasm! I was joking man
Don't scare the shit out of the cute dino!
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
Maybe my shitpost detection is not working properly, I am more used to deank / eol's shitpost.
If needed, I would rather lose a few bucks per month than being falsely accused as a cheater.
"Humanity is f*cked up" - Jay
@FAT32 No accusation from my side. Just asked out of curiosity and maybe a little jealousy, hoping it was idling on your hand.