-------------------------------------------------
nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
benchmark timestamp: 2019-12-03 16:45:42 UTC
-------------------------------------------------
Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores: 1
Frequency: 2400.284 MHz
RAM: 974M
Swap: 190M
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64
Disks:
xvda 500G SSD
CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
4.557 seconds
CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
7.593 seconds
CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
2.073 seconds
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 99.2 us / 161.3 us / 30.2 ms / 316.9 us
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 10.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.59 GiB, 2.12 k iops, 531.3 MiB/s
dd: sequential write speed
1st run: 287.06 MiB/s
2nd run: 358.58 MiB/s
3rd run: 343.32 MiB/s
average: 329.65 MiB/s
No IPv4 connectivity detected
IPv6 speedtests
your IPv6: 2602:ffd5:1:xxxx
Leaseweb (NL): 6.51 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US): 10.45 MiB/s
Online.net (FR): 10.50 MiB/s
OVH BHS (CA): 11.25 MiB/s
-------------------------------------------------
⭕ A simple uptime dashboard using UptimeRobot API https://upy.duo.ovh
⭕ Currently using VPS from BuyVM, GreenCloudVPS, Gullo's, Hetzner, HostHatch, InceptionHosting, LetBox, MaxKVM, MrVM, VirMach.
ioping: seek rate
min/avg/max/mdev = 107.4 us / 1.85 ms / 295.3 ms / 10.0 ms
ioping: sequential read speed
generated 5.85 k requests in 5.00 s, 1.43 GiB, 1.17 k iops, 292.6 MiB/s
Well, I was hyped at first, but afterwards, after SOMEONE started digging, because it sounded to good to be true.
I decided that I likely just let it on idle or only put not important data on it.
He does post since 2010, but his company is only 1 year old, he did XX changes in the company name for unknown reasons.
If you google his name, you find stuff, you do not expect to find.
Same goes for Stockservers, if you bought that, you better start digging.
Neoon said: He does post since 2010, but his company is only 1 year old, he did XX changes in the company name for unknown reasons.
If you google his name, you find stuff, you do not expect to find.
Can you share more of what you found concerning, in another unindexed thread if you prefer?
Quebec's Enterprise Register shows the company was registered in 2010-09-23 as "RICA WEB HOSTING SERVICES" / "LES SERVICES D'HÉBERGEMENT DE PAGES WEB RICA". The address in the entry (ID 2266846825) matches the one in the IP range. The one registered in 2018-03-20 (ID 2266846825), "Rica Web Services Inc." / "Les Services Web Rica Inc." looks to be an IT consulting company headed by the same person with a different address.
This looks to me like the company got its start by offering shared hosting/whmcs module, changing its name slightly a few times, then expanded from there. They were selling VPS back around 2014, so they are not a newbie to the hosting business even though the inc. is a bit over a year old.
I didn't find anything in particular while searching the founder's name, or resoundingly negative reviews about the company?
Asking as a first-time customer, no affiliation with them.
Neoon said: He does post since 2010, but his company is only 1 year old, he did XX changes in the company name for unknown reasons.
If you google his name, you find stuff, you do not expect to find.
Can you share more of what you found concerning, in another unindexed thread if you prefer?
Quebec's Enterprise Register shows the company was registered in 2010-09-23 as "RICA WEB HOSTING SERVICES" / "LES SERVICES D'HÉBERGEMENT DE PAGES WEB RICA". The address in the entry (ID 2266846825) matches the one in the IP range. The one registered in 2018-03-20 (ID 2266846825), "Rica Web Services Inc." / "Les Services Web Rica Inc." looks to be an IT consulting company headed by the same person with a different address.
This looks to me like the company got its start by offering shared hosting/whmcs module, changing its name slightly a few times, then expanded from there. They were selling VPS back around 2014, so they are not a newbie to the hosting business even though the inc. is a bit over a year old.
I didn't find anything in particular while searching the founder's name, or resoundingly negative reviews about the company?
Asking as a first-time customer, no affiliation with them.
When you search for the company mentioned in the footer, you get one hit:
Created: 2018-03-20, I see no registration from 2010.
He is listed apparently on the No Fly List, which does not seem trustworthy to me.
Someone made me aware of it, can be a sign or not.
Neoon said: When you search for the company mentioned in the footer, you get one hit:
Created: 2018-03-20, I see no registration from 2010.
Try searching for "rica web" in the Quebec Enterprise Register, there should be 2 registry IDs in the results. The federal one only shows a partial result.
Neoon said: He is listed apparently on the No Fly List, which does not seem trustworthy to me.
Someone made me aware of it, can be a sign or not.
Yeah, I saw the news articles. Supposing for a moment it is the same person, the Office of Reconsideration has sinceconcluded he is not a threat to passengers and shouldn't have been on the list. Cut to some vague definition of "immediate" threat (which included people who might be considered as such in the future), also browsing certain "extremist" websites can land a person on a secret list with little to no oversight. While opinions may differ on this, such lists seem dubious to me at best.
All that said, backups, backups. Same goes for providers you trust as well.
Didn't get because haven't figured out how to tunnel through HE to access the box. I do have some NATs with @mikho that has IPv6 so I should try and figure it out.
@poisson Fwiw, you could also install OpenVPN (or other VPN server) on one of the NATs to get ipv6. Any of the popular OpenVPN install scripts on GitHub with ipv6 support will do the job. (Enable tun and assign an ipv6 address to the box from the CP, run the script. I've tried it on a LES box and it works nicely.)
Have not pushed the network but it feels snappy enough via ssh from 4000 kilometers away
Had you not given me a fair idea about where you live, I would have guessed you lived at one (or maybe more?) of the following places that are about 4,000 kilometers from Montreal :
a. Just west off the Irish Coast
b. Somewhere north of the arctic circle
c. Somehere near the Caribbeans- close to Barbados
d. Somewhere in the Seattle area
@Neoon said:
Well, I was hyped at first, but afterwards, after SOMEONE started digging, because it sounded to good to be true.
I decided that I likely just let it on idle or only put not important data on it.
He does post since 2010, but his company is only 1 year old, he did XX changes in the company name for unknown reasons.
If you google his name, you find stuff, you do not expect to find.
Same goes for Stockservers, if you bought that, you better start digging.
@souen said:
Yeah, I saw the news articles. Supposing for a moment it is the same person, the Office of Reconsideration has sinceconcluded he is not a threat to passengers and shouldn't have been on the list. Cut to some vague definition of "immediate" threat (which included people who might be considered as such in the future), also browsing certain "extremist" websites can land a person on a secret list with little to no oversight. While opinions may differ on this, such lists seem dubious to me at best.
All that said, backups, backups. Same goes for providers you trust as well.
Well, well, Well, I used the "new new new " Interface, that just gave me one result.
This server is not trustworthy enough for important data, but is not great for development either (possible summer host). It could be nice as backup, or seedbox for Linux iso.
tl;dr Doesn't specifically forbid torrent software. No illegal activities (by Canadian law), no copyright or intellectual property right infringement. The sort of thing most TOS say, don't get the host in trouble, use your own discretion.
What makes you say that? Some providers have come and gone, less time than this provider has been around, and they don't get downplayed as summerhosts.
The Mouse offer was probably a limited-quantity loss-leader for them (and now they let people who accidentally got ipv4 keep them, which wasn't advertised with the plan). If the boxes turned out to have even 99% uptime, it would be a decent deal for the price, if only because it's a bit like AU, offers by CA companies with a CA location tend to cost more.
souen said: tl;dr Doesn't specifically forbid torrent software. No illegal activities (by Canadian law), no copyright or intellectual property right infringement. The sort of thing most TOS say, don't get the host in trouble, use your own discretion.
souen said: tl;dr Doesn't specifically forbid torrent software. No illegal activities (by Canadian law), no copyright or intellectual property right infringement. The sort of thing most TOS say, don't get the host in trouble, use your own discretion.
we are ok with torrents but not with copyright issues
So if what you are doing does not generate copyright notices to us do what you want we will not check what you do
Comments
no, they dont have an ipv4 unfortunately
Great deal, so far seems pretty nice - seeing 200 to 300 MB/s write speeds.
A teeny bit of CPU steal while idling (maybe up to 1%, more often around 0.3-0.7)
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz cpu MHz : 2400.274 cache size : 12288 KB flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl pni pclmulqdq ssse3 cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes hypervisor lahf_lm ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp kaiser amd_ibpb flush_l1dHave not pushed the network but it feels snappy enough via ssh from 4000 kilometers away
HS4LIFE (+ (* 3 4) (* 5 6))
Looks good so far. Not sure what I'll do with it yet, maybe set up Nextcloud or Minio on it.
------------------------------------------------- nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh benchmark timestamp: 2019-12-03 16:35:38 UTC ------------------------------------------------- Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz CPU cores: 1 Frequency: 2399.980 MHz RAM: 974M Swap: - Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 Disks: xvda 500G SSD CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB 4.563 seconds CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB 7.539 seconds CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB 1.904 seconds ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 93.7 us / 153.6 us / 46.5 ms / 385.3 us ioping: sequential read speed generated 11.3 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.76 GiB, 2.26 k iops, 564.6 MiB/s dd: sequential write speed 1st run: 314.71 MiB/s 2nd run: 346.18 MiB/s 3rd run: 350.95 MiB/s average: 337.28 MiB/s No IPv4 connectivity detected IPv6 speedtests your IPv6: xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx Leaseweb (NL): 13.92 MiB/s Softlayer DAL (US): 4.74 MiB/s Online.net (FR): 11.82 MiB/s OVH BHS (CA): 32.47 MiB/s -------------------------------------------------Here the benchmark..
------------------------------------------------- nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh benchmark timestamp: 2019-12-03 16:45:42 UTC ------------------------------------------------- Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz CPU cores: 1 Frequency: 2400.284 MHz RAM: 974M Swap: 190M Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 x86_64 Disks: xvda 500G SSD CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB 4.557 seconds CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB 7.593 seconds CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB 2.073 seconds ioping: seek rate min/avg/max/mdev = 99.2 us / 161.3 us / 30.2 ms / 316.9 us ioping: sequential read speed generated 10.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 2.59 GiB, 2.12 k iops, 531.3 MiB/s dd: sequential write speed 1st run: 287.06 MiB/s 2nd run: 358.58 MiB/s 3rd run: 343.32 MiB/s average: 329.65 MiB/s No IPv4 connectivity detected IPv6 speedtests your IPv6: 2602:ffd5:1:xxxx Leaseweb (NL): 6.51 MiB/s Softlayer DAL (US): 10.45 MiB/s Online.net (FR): 10.50 MiB/s OVH BHS (CA): 11.25 MiB/s -------------------------------------------------⭕ A simple uptime dashboard using UptimeRobot API https://upy.duo.ovh
⭕ Currently using VPS from BuyVM, GreenCloudVPS, Gullo's, Hetzner, HostHatch, InceptionHosting, LetBox, MaxKVM, MrVM, VirMach.
>
I can't get the code format to work, but there it is with Centos.
I didn't get it, but would be great to have one (to idle, again).
Someone on Chinese forum claims that he got one with IPv4 (I don't know how, maybe there's a loophole somewhere)
"Humanity is f*cked up" - Jay
IPv4 was an extra option for $18/yr IIRC.
Yup, but seems like some of them got it for free, if I understand correctly: https://www.hostloc.com/thread-616752-1-1.html
"Humanity is f*cked up" - Jay
Speaking of free, you @FAT32 need to pick the next winner of a @cociu special. We're past 400 accounts.
I got one for replace my hosthatch box.
I am a data hamster that collect every youtube video I have watch
Action and Reaction in history
yesss!! i got one.
Well, I was hyped at first, but afterwards, after SOMEONE started digging, because it sounded to good to be true.
I decided that I likely just let it on idle or only put not important data on it.
He does post since 2010, but his company is only 1 year old, he did XX changes in the company name for unknown reasons.
If you google his name, you find stuff, you do not expect to find.
Same goes for Stockservers, if you bought that, you better start digging.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC
Can you share more of what you found concerning, in another unindexed thread if you prefer?
Quebec's Enterprise Register shows the company was registered in 2010-09-23 as "RICA WEB HOSTING SERVICES" / "LES SERVICES D'HÉBERGEMENT DE PAGES WEB RICA". The address in the entry (ID 2266846825) matches the one in the IP range. The one registered in 2018-03-20 (ID 2266846825), "Rica Web Services Inc." / "Les Services Web Rica Inc." looks to be an IT consulting company headed by the same person with a different address.
This looks to me like the company got its start by offering shared hosting/whmcs module, changing its name slightly a few times, then expanded from there. They were selling VPS back around 2014, so they are not a newbie to the hosting business even though the inc. is a bit over a year old.
I didn't find anything in particular while searching the founder's name, or resoundingly negative reviews about the company?
Asking as a first-time customer, no affiliation with them.
When you search for the company mentioned in the footer, you get one hit:
Created: 2018-03-20, I see no registration from 2010.
He is listed apparently on the No Fly List, which does not seem trustworthy to me.
Someone made me aware of it, can be a sign or not.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC
Try searching for "rica web" in the Quebec Enterprise Register, there should be 2 registry IDs in the results. The federal one only shows a partial result.
Yeah, I saw the news articles. Supposing for a moment it is the same person, the Office of Reconsideration has since concluded he is not a threat to passengers and shouldn't have been on the list. Cut to some vague definition of "immediate" threat (which included people who might be considered as such in the future), also browsing certain "extremist" websites can land a person on a secret list with little to no oversight. While opinions may differ on this, such lists seem dubious to me at best.
All that said, backups, backups. Same goes for providers you trust as well.
Didn't get because haven't figured out how to tunnel through HE to access the box. I do have some NATs with @mikho that has IPv6 so I should try and figure it out.
Deals and Reviews: LowEndBoxes Review | Avoid dodgy providers with The LEBRE Whitelist | Free hosting (with conditions): Evolution-Host, NanoKVM, FreeMach, ServedEZ | Get expert copyediting and copywriting help at The Write Flow
@poisson Fwiw, you could also install OpenVPN (or other VPN server) on one of the NATs to get ipv6. Any of the popular OpenVPN install scripts on GitHub with ipv6 support will do the job. (Enable tun and assign an ipv6 address to the box from the CP, run the script. I've tried it on a LES box and it works nicely.)
Had you not given me a fair idea about where you live, I would have guessed you lived at one (or maybe more?) of the following places that are about 4,000 kilometers from Montreal :
a. Just west off the Irish Coast
b. Somewhere north of the arctic circle
c. Somehere near the Caribbeans- close to Barbados
d. Somewhere in the Seattle area
I don't know about you, but I prefer (b) or (c)
VPS reviews | | MicroLXC | English is my nth language.
Got one. Pushed me to finally turn on IPv6 on my home network, so that's nice. I'll move my nextcloud install from my home server to it.
It's pronounced hacker.
Yes
he keeps changing, but the name is still bad
the plot thickens
They noticed their mistake
Got an email today:
Need a free NAT LXC? -> https://microlxc.net/
Well, well, Well, I used the "new new new " Interface, that just gave me one result.
Free NAT KVM | Free NAT LXC
This server is not trustworthy enough for important data, but is not great for development either (possible summer host). It could be nice as backup, or seedbox for Linux iso.
Are they torrent friendly ?
If they're a summer host it's a pretty long con.
https://servarica.com/terms-of-service/
tl;dr Doesn't specifically forbid torrent software. No illegal activities (by Canadian law), no copyright or intellectual property right infringement. The sort of thing most TOS say, don't get the host in trouble, use your own discretion.
What makes you say that? Some providers have come and gone, less time than this provider has been around, and they don't get downplayed as summerhosts.
The Mouse offer was probably a limited-quantity loss-leader for them (and now they let people who accidentally got ipv4 keep them, which wasn't advertised with the plan). If the boxes turned out to have even 99% uptime, it would be a decent deal for the price, if only because it's a bit like AU, offers by CA companies with a CA location tend to cost more.
Since @servarica_hani is here
Could you enlighten us on
we are ok with torrents but not with copyright issues
So if what you are doing does not generate copyright notices to us do what you want we will not check what you do