<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>provisioning — LowEndSpirit DEV</title>
        <link>https://dev.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>provisioning — LowEndSpirit DEV</description>
    <atom:link href="https://dev.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussions/tagged/provisioning/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Who's into fleet provisioning?</title>
        <link>https://dev.lowendspirit.com/index.php?p=/discussion/994/whos-into-fleet-provisioning</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 17:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>General</category>
        <dc:creator>FlamingSpaceJunk</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">994@/index.php?p=/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm curious, how does everyone provision their server fleet?</p>

<p>Packet.net released <a rel="nofollow" href="https://tinkerbell.org/" title="Tinkerbell">Tinkerbell</a> under the Apache 2.0 license today, which got me thinking about the last time I needed to deal with provisioning lots of servers and the plans which were made. There are other baremetal provisioning systems out there, like cobbler, MASS, and razor, and there are VM provisioning systems like OpenNebula. What's good, bad, or has lots of gotchas?</p>
]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
