Francisco
Francisco
Comments
-
@AnthonySmith just make a "verified member" group and give it to people like @PHP_Backend that way they can talk anyway. Francisco
-
The more I can automate, the less I have to pay towards my workers bar tabs/liver translplants. Francisco
-
Don't even need to ticket. You can use proxyarp. Francisco
-
They have the numbers of what the real cpanel cancellation was in relation to revenue. In a year I've only been able to cancel a single buyshared node. Basically anyone with 10 or 20 a accounts usually stayed. The main people the jumped ship had hundreds. Blesta is ok but still a far ways away. Hostbill is maybe good but…
-
Yep. They already do that for new licenses but it has an 'unlimited' option at $50/month. Meh, but not jaw breaking. What do you think the price goes to? I see them doing $0.50/month per active customer or similar. Francisco
-
Its a razors edge in some of it. 3 of those have,had a NAT focus so they don't have IP costs. I still believe virmach is at least partially owned by CC, or could be soon. There has been a big falling out between a lot of large Chinese resellers and their hosts. This has meant that many providers are sitting on mountains of…
-
You should document what the renewal is. Francisco
-
I own all of my IP addresses, Virmach doesn't. I heard a lot of stories/etc of the deals CC would give to get people onboard, basically a free /24 or /23 with every E5. Francisco
-
Yep, i'll be filling that out soon :) But basically: 53667,0,1 = learned from transit53667,0,2 = learned from peer53667,0,3 = learned from clientExample:53667,1,174 = learned from cogent transit53667,1,6939 = learned from HE transit53667,101,X = prepend 1 time to ASN X53667,102,X = prepend 2 times to ASN X53667,103,X =…
-
If this hasn't been fixed yet go ahead and log a ticket. Francisco
-
No offers at the moment. Francisco
-
The total is shared between all vm's in your account. You can snapshot a VM and then restore it to another VM within the same location. Francisco
-
I think they'll do like ubersmith did and put 'you cant upgrade past this without enrolling in the new licensing model'. They would remove the unlimited option and charge a flat fee for all active users. I also see the price going up as the "1000 active" is $0.02/user/month. I see that going to $0.10 - $0.20, maybe even…
-
End of life time licenses. Francisco
-
Didn't he promise he wouldn't do anymore top-ups way back when? But in literally every single offer he sends out he has another? Top-ups once in a blue moon (basically special times) is OK. Doing it all the time screams 100% of liquidity issues. Francisco
-
"Support". All the stories I heard is that SolusVM v1 went literal years without any updates past 'fixing the footer". Stripping away support isn't going to do anything or force anyone. I know some people use Proxmox for things but i've never been impressed with it + the WHMCS modules out there. I think Solus.IO is…
-
No ones really giving a shit. I've been screaming from the mountains since OnApp owned Solus that they're going to slam the price. The one fellow that used to post on LET (Terry?) would always dodge my question about it. I'm not sure if they have the balls to enforce a $5/m/core on legacy SolusVM 1 customers. If they did…
-
Plesk is owned by the same firm. They'll get the same hike in time. Solus will too. Francisco
-
Shared didn't change much, what got fucked was resellers. For shared we padded our prices a couple bucks a year since we charge basically nothing anyway. For resellers we had no choice but to start charging for all sub accounts, but have rolled out DirectAdmin based plans as well. Francisco
-
Honestly, maybe we'll sell a couple hundred VM's throughout all the locations within a year. We're in 2 unique markets, Las Vegas and Luxembourg, where no one offers BGP sessions (at least not without having to lease a full dedicated or do colocation). That'll draw in all the people wanting to grow their CDN/anycast…
-
No. Never. MT will be available at $5/mbit with a minimum 100mbit clean commit. Francisco
-
:) Again, no hard ETA on this since we're working on the Ryzen upgrades in NY but once I get a single session the way I want it (basically communities and such) then the rest is just some database and UI work. ECMP might get delayed a bit, but I think people want BGP more than that. Francisco
-
For fun: Francisco
-
I'll see about adding a 'power off my VPS' option to the page for people that want it. We use LVM snapshots so it should be fine. Edit - clarity Francisco
-
We've been trying to decide how to improve our IPV6. One of the proposed ideas is: * Single primary IPv6, can't be changed * /48 routed to the VPS via said IP (or the link-local) * RDNS still done in stallion per IP, but maybe we could prefer delegated instead? We'd then support DHCPv6. Francisco
-
For now I think I got enough resumes to work through :) I got a few people I've talked with more with possible offers going their way. Thanks agian! Francisco
-
Yes since the main part of this is me finally getting a weekend off of my own :P Francisco
-
If you have a legacy OVZ 128 then it'd have been upgraded to 512MB by now for free :) It also has a /64 you can assign out of. Francisco
-
We originally did a /64 on their interface due to OpenVZ, but we've been thinking about changing it up a lot. With us wanting to roll out BGP sessions we need users to have a static primary IPV6 address which isn't a thing right now. Right now we're thinking of basically assigning everyone a single IP from a shared /64 by…
-
WD Blacks, the old school pinnacle of performance, now in SMR. Francisco
-
Seriously. There's so many decent hosts out there that include DA in their plans. Why bother using VestaCP? The thing needs a top/down audit. Francisco
-
We talked about it but I don't know the market well enough to want to deal with it. It's cut throat (more so than VPS) with far more costs than a single VPS node. Sorta. I have 2 providers looking to buy it all but there's some final disagreements to get through. I'll obviously work something out for anyone wanting to…
-
Yeah, I saw the CPU complaint, that's why it'd be a single node testing it. Wondering what the CPU one would be though. Francisco