InceptionHosting
InceptionHosting
Please do not write on my wall/activity feed or PM for Technical Support use: https://clients.inceptionhosting.com/ where appropriate.
Thanks.
Comments
-
The key word being sequential I/O it is still amazing to me that people still think it has anything to do with real world performance, it is not even a good indicator in most cases. ]# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test--2020-05-09 23:35:59-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.testResolving cachefly.cachefly.net…
-
That I can offer. That is not something I can do with that much storage for under €10, honestly for that sort of work load a dedicated server or good VPS with attached storage is better.
-
So you are saying that is your preference I guess? To be clear I am not looking to offer a completely different product line, I am looking to tune the current VPS storage offers.
-
There has been some work done on that over the past few days, it should be improved now. That said sequential I/O is always going to be low and I cant really pay much attention to that as it is completely expected and there is literally nothing you should be running on a storage VPS where sequential I/O is at all relevant.…
-
That just means 2k3 server instead of a secure (ish) one
-
You missed an E, totally changed the whole meme
-
Finally sorted, I can go to bed now for a few hours.
-
yep, just recovering from an attack from China, most nodes have IPv6 again, the NAT service is not playing ball, looks like the whole node has got itself in a twist, rebooting the whole node atm.
-
OK I will opt out of this discussion then.
-
Its everything wrong in the world.
-
Interesting, I wonder if I could get away with using that answer when nob heads use the NAT services for public torrents, usually some shit like love island.
-
It is more than enough, I am trying to get you to test and post the results of that because it simulates real world use, in what world are you downloading a 10GB file on to a VPS that cost less than your lunch? Honestly if I had to guess based on your comments so far i would assume you have been IO de-prioritized due to…
-
what do you get when not trying artificial benchmarks e.g. : wget http://speedtest.ams01.softlayer.com/downloads/test100.zip
-
The ram still needs to buffer everything, when you run out of ram even though that may not show up as used ram in htop between refreshes it then swaps around which is disk based, that's just how things work, also htop itself uses more than 1% cpu usually to run so I am not sure how reliable the data you are looking at is.…
-
It happened because you were probably trying to squeeze so much in that there was barley any room for anything else, 256mb ram on kvm/xen is significantly less than is required to run unless you are prepared to do some expert level tuning. So you essentially downloaded more ram lol. You cant add swap on containers/vz
-
I have gone ahead and updated the title to reflect reality rather than give bad PR then.
-
yep.
-
You have a VPS with 1998 RAM in a super high contention environment while testing it with 2020 tools, I would not put much store by your results tbh. If it works for what you need great, if it does not, pay more, you are at the super ultra mega budget end of the spectrum. You don't enter a skateboard in to a NASCAR race…
-
tweaks have been tweaked, see if thats better for you.
-
how much Ram do you have?
-
@Brueggus some settings tweaked, can you check now please although this really only should have been impacting ping/icmp.
-
Let me take a look in to this further then.
-
I am checking now, span up a test VM, what I am 99% sure I am seeing is just ICMP queuing, I cannot see any issues with TCP, are you monitoring over ICMP only as well?
-
Pop a ticket in.
-
The only think worth mentioning just for a correctness stand point is that "nf_tables is not available in old OpenVZ kernels" should probably read "nf_tables is not available as standard in current OpenVZ kernels" as there are not really any old ones not in production VZ6 is 6 months+ EOL now. and current VZ7 follows the…
-
I remember going through a similar thing about 10 years ago, it did not end well.
-
A full course meal :)
-
To be honest for all I know the nf_tables issues has been resolved in a later vz7/virtuozzo kernel, as I was a fairly early adopter of VZ7 in the LE* world and the fixes soon got fairly well documented so maybe a lot of people have just found that. I don't fancy putting that theory to the test just for funzies though :)…
-
It is simply that the 3.x VZ kernel does not support nf_tables, while I did experiment early on when debian 10 was released to load the modules it caused significant instability. So you really need to add an if deb=10 then: apt install iptablesupdate-alternatives --set iptables /usr/sbin/iptables-legacyupdate-alternatives…