joepie91

Back to Profile

joepie91

Got this e-mail from PHP-Friends recently; English version is pasted below. It's really a newsletter with a bunch of stuff, but most of it is about the merger.

Gotta say, this is the first ti…

Thanked by (3)jureve chocolateshirt Ympker
> [@Hxxx said](/discussion/2764/interesting-popular-screenshot-tool-removed-from-chrome-ext-store-and-marked-as-malware): In reality browsers are better off without plugins.

Not really, it…

Thanked by (1)Hxxx
It appears that this was the construction of SBG2:

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BKfAgXZCEAEkJOl?format=jpg&name=large)

And apparently [they were using water sprinklers, not gas…

Thanked by (1)Janevski
Congratulations, and an excellent introduction :)

It makes me very happy to see that a peaceful community-voted transfer of 'ownership' can just... happen, here! I think anyone who has been a…

Thanked by (6)Mason InceptionHosting Wolveix mikho Ympker ialexpw
> @servarica_hani said:
> Well for me they all seem good but what missing for me is what their vision for LES
> Is it possible that all new LES admin candidates give brief explanati…

Thanked by (5)Abdullah uptime Iroshan464 Nekki servarica_hani
> [@lentro said](/discussion/comment/22278/#Comment_22278): When you store with Storj, your data is stored in 80 shards around the world. If North Korea bombs Ashburn, you’ll lose all data on Wasa…

Thanked by (2)saibal WSS
> [@xyphos10 said](/discussion/812/how-successful-will-the-storj-project-decentralized-cloud-storage-be): With the prices below, how good of an alternative to using AWS or google cloud do you thin…

Thanked by (2)AlSwearengen uptime
> @AnthonySmith said:
> I believe this research was funded by intel.

Oh, huh, you're right.

> Additional funding was provided by generous gifts from Intel. Any opinions, …

Thanked by (1)InceptionHosting
I haven't played with it much yet, but AFAIK, PostgreSQL's full-text search capabilities are a lot better (and probably more performant) than those of MySQL.

Given that PostgreSQL is *general…

Thanked by (1)vimalware
> @poisson said:
> If you are in the USA, I say 3 bucks is worth it just for giggles at the havoc you are going to wreak.
>
> https://fortune.com/2020/03/05/delete-location-d…

Thanked by (1)uptime
> @comi said:
> > @joepie91 said:
> > > @comi said:
> > > Because people will pay premium to someone who saves them from all that frightening servers, command l…

Thanked by (3)comi uptime vimalware
> @comi said:
> Because people will pay premium to someone who saves them from all that frightening servers, command line, infrastructure and engineering in general.

That's the thin…

Thanked by (2)Abdullah uptime
Because people will pay it.

The big cloudycloud providers benefit from the "can't get fired for buying IBM" effect. It's a bad deal, a lot of people know it, but the important thing is that t…

Thanked by (2)Abdullah vimalware
> [@willie said](/discussion/comment/19560/#Comment_19560): Sharding (splitting a single big dataset across multiple servers) and replication (maintaining multiple copies of a dataset for HA) are …

Thanked by (1)flips
> @lightblade said:
> > @joepie91 said:
>
> > Okay, so what that is *really* referring to, is that MongoDB uses __sharding__ (basically, distributing records across mul…

Thanked by (2)sanvit lightblade
> [@SagnikS said](/discussion/comment/19517/#Comment_19517): but I've heard that they apparently scale better than MySQL.

> [@SagnikS said](/discussion/comment/19517/#Comment_19517): I …

Thanked by (4)sanvit vimalware angstrom SagnikS
> @SagnikS said:
> > @joepie91 said:
> > Avoid MongoDB. It's a mediocre database *at best*, and you're quite likely to end up with some form of data corruption over time, give…

Thanked by (1)sanvit
> [@willie said](/discussion/comment/19282/#Comment_19282): Mongo is easy to get started with (document db instead of relational) and has an easy replication setup

Here's the problem, thou…

Thanked by (6)chimichurri quicksilver03 sanvit vimalware angstrom WSS
Avoid MongoDB. It's a mediocre database *at best*, and you're quite likely to end up with some form of data corruption over time, given that it doesn't validate data integrity like an RDBMS would.

Thanked by (1)vimalware
> [@AnthonySmith said](/discussion/comment/18361/#Comment_18361): Being someone who still genuinely holds the values of LE* I like to do more with less :)

Which is appreciated :)

Thanked by (5)vimalware comi Clouvider AlwaysSkint InceptionHosting

This Site is currently in maintenance mode.
Please check back here later.

→ Site Settings