InceptionHosting
InceptionHosting
Please do not write on my wall/activity feed or PM for Technical Support use: https://clients.inceptionhosting.com/ where appropriate.
Thanks.
Comments
-
yeah good point, someone post about them on the proxmox forum and I will give a free Pepsi for every referred sign up :)
-
In the end I went with 4,64,512 and 1m will be an interesting graph :) I have just set off a 24-hour net and disk test on 2 servers at 11:00 am (UK/London) I will stop it just after 11:00 am tomorrow and graph the results for a new post.
-
I think small NAT BSD container/jails would be very interesting, but I dont think you would see much interest in the LE market beyond that.
-
I just used a super lightweight install and run a script that starts it as part of the x window forwarding and kill it off after, you can keep it very lightweight and on-demand, probably uses around an extra 256mb ram when running.
-
I mean, that's obviously a bit of a concern :) haha
-
It was out in beta LONG before that, I think 10 was just when they included it as standard, I may be misremembering (I am old now) but I am pretty sure I remember trying to get it working on FreeBSD 6
-
I remember reading about it on a Pentium II, I thought it was long abandoned tbh.
-
Are you set on it being a web-based panel? I ask because virt manager is awesome and you can open it over ssh with x-window forwarding.
-
Well as @vimalware is the only one that actually wanted it seems pointless doing a draw. :) Will Pm details.
-
makes total sense, I think given that, perhaps the best thing to do is rather than a separate read and write test I do a 50/50 split as you suggested and do 1 at 4k and 1 at 512k and graph them both.
-
Ok a bounty may be the way to go, I will add $35 to bump it up to $50
-
It sure is interesting but wide open to abuse, removing the abuse element though and assume 90% of people are honest, it could only work in the VPS industry if there was some way to balance that upstream as we all have upstream bills to pay and I am pretty sure @clouvider does not want to give me any discounts because 50%…
-
I apologise, I have read that 3 times and only understand half of it, could you try again?
-
So you don't want it then?
-
I am thinking in terms of real-world uncached random file access and database reads, which is going to account for a huge majority of real-world use cases, one of the studies I read over was by EMC (SAN makers) and the report concluded that the difference between 4k and 512k was essentially just a margin of error and then…
-
This is why I was looking for others to help benchmark stuff but it seemed everyone wanted to go the automated+synthetic route which is kind of pointless imho, if anyone wants to run some tests on it and give their perspective they will take priority as they will only need it for a few days. @Neoon @sureiam @vyas…
-
@Mason ok so upon doing some reading I should probably pick 4k or 512k going forward, I will probably go with 4k unless anyone thinks different?