miu
miu
Comments
-
It is confusing whole. I worry that he sooner meant that recurring discount will be remove from 1.1.2023 (discounted price is valid only till end of the year 2022) @ReliableSite_Radic can you finally explain how it is and confirm? Thanks
-
Ok then this should means that discounts are working only till end of this year Can u confirm or better explain it @ReliableSite_Radic ?
-
UPDATE: at checkout and after applying of code i see " Recurring Discount" So answer is probably YES
-
Question: Are these discounts reccuring? $10 off: July10OFFTHRU2022 $20 off $50+: JULY20OFF50THRU2022 $40 off $100+: JULY40OFF100THRU2022 $70 off $150+: JULY70OFF150THRU2022 $100 off $200+: JULY100OFF200THRU2022 Or only first month?
-
Truth, ()and OVH server often income with 10G down but 250/500mbit up) but still it is possible: 1) i also got luckily 10G (including upload too) by OVH 2) see his bench - there is very clearly visible that this is really 10G upload in his case
-
I keep my fingers crossed IMO Fran is a perfectionist: even if he did not avoid the outages too (which also happens to the largest providers), you can be sure that he will immediately start resolving the situation asap with all his might and do his best to rectify it as soon as possible, very good experience with him, i…
-
Or when u r using Blesta, maybe u should migrate rather to Fran in such case.. (than risk potentially worried users that u r dead, imo harmful for your business and its health)
-
Sorry for the necro, but suggests this, that end is nigh?
-
apologies boss @InceptionHosting for necro #4 but we all unpatiently waiting for some new awesome Inception exclusive offers! Without Inception offers longer time this forum is so sad :'( and desolate edited: typo redress: necro #5
-
Probably no more unsustainable services & offers by him, now realistic prices (covering his real fees and some profit)
-
Glad to see u grow. And when will need colocate in future some HW on Florida, now i know where i should to go!
-
for 4c & 100GB disk i assume sooner price around ~$100/2y, not 138
-
Good day Something larger - such as: 100+G NVMe 4+ AMD vcores possible pls? T y
-
Truth. I assume seems be solution. And apologies for my blindness.
-
Hi Tom, Check proxmox thread Is possible that dude who have updated it found solution (add hwaddress param into config file) When i will have any time i will try/test it then i'll be back with result Have a great weekend everyone!
-
Great works!
-
Thank you for all your contribution, time and suggestions, appreciated by me!
-
Additionally - bridged config with DHCP also does not work on OVH with PVE7 (ISO installation) auto loiface lo inet loopbackiface eno3 inet manualauto vmbr0iface vmbr0 inet dhcp bridge-ports eno3 bridge-stp off bridge-fd 0 (on 6.4 ISO works)
-
Nothing for thanking ;-) Unfortunately non-paid (customer) support there is not very well (slow and sometime w/o response of staff ever).. But i understand that for complete and good support i should purchase paid licence
-
Hello Oles (Tom) SURE (hopefully i do not break any rules when post here URL from another forum) https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-node-on-ovh-soyoustart-unreachable-after-each-reboot.93470/ I will be glad when this may help to someone in future For now as i have mentioned i have resolved it so that i have…
-
no response from Proxmox staff on it yet (on their forum where i reported issue), when will be then i will update this thread also
-
and here is (mine) working network log from SYS with PVE6.4 (installed from ISO) with bridged (above mentioned) config, bridge port found and works as should: -- Logs begin at Tue 2021-07-27 20:23:58 CEST, end at Wed 2021-07-28 13:49:12 CEST. -- Jul 27 20:24:03 pve systemd[1]: Starting Raise network interfaces... Jul 27…
-
Good day good people! :) UPDATE from another forum (credit @ polluxtroy3758) = what is in journalctl log on OVH-brands PVE7 server: bridge port does not exist -- Boot 1d7b66b4b10e4870b9c19a354be86dcf --Jul 28 10:00:14 pve systemd[1]: Starting Network initialization...Jul 28 10:00:14 pve networking[617]: networking:…
-
u r right - exactly ma face after suffering from this issue! :-D
-
So just now i can conclude only: auto loiface lo inet loopbackiface eno3 inet manualauto vmbr0iface vmbr0 inet static address 54.38.192.11/24 gateway 54.38.192.254 bridge-ports eno3 bridge-stp off bridge-fd 0 works on Proxmox 6.4 + SYS well (network works without any troubles) but on new Proxmox v7 + SYS not at all…
-
Hello Oles, firstly thank you for your response! ANSWER @ A) Remotely Through IPMI console ANSWER @ B & C: Thanks for your suggestion - this i not tried (change bridge-ports from ens 3 to none) From time reasons after several hours of frustration i reinstalled whole node from ISO 6.4 - it works FINE (network) with my above…
-
update 2: after searching on net i found that several ppl report the same problem after upgrade on PROXMOX 7 (unreachable network). So probably version 7 is still pretty bugged. (maybe reason why OVH still not offers Proxmox 7 template?) I tried several changes in config but not resolved this (not found exact reason and…
-
Here ppl can see pretty big contrast: While most users ask for transfer fee (many time also quite greedy fee calculated to edge), this one not ever. Falzo is good guy and great man/human (y) :+1:
-
I think i am also quite deprecated so they are still ok for me also nowadays :-D But seriously - thanks for the info & update.
-
Great and completely written in short (y) and for checking of gateway i use also these commands route -n ; netstat -rn ; ip route show
-
UPDATE: After another day of searching, reading and investigations probably i found probable reason of problem and also usable solution (not quit clean but yet seems all work well) CAUSE: Seems, when firewalld and Proxmox VE meet self on one host/OS, they compete about control of ebtables, have conflict: On begin, ebtables…
-
And just these applications are important (runs significantly better&faster directly on host than inside another nested virtualized environment - mean when i would place it inside nested KVM instance instead on proxmox node.. because host always get much more preferably system resources when compete about them w nested…
-
Yes I have the same opinion that is better use Iptables only instead firewalld in combination w proxmox. Problem is there is (on host node) used another software what require firewalld (uses just firewalld) And just these applications are important (runs significantly better&faster directly on host than inside another…
-
Additionally - iptables output if this can be useful: # iptables -S-P INPUT ACCEPT-P FORWARD ACCEPT-P OUTPUT ACCEPT-N FORWARD_IN_ZONES-N FORWARD_IN_ZONES_SOURCE-N FORWARD_OUT_ZONES-N FORWARD_OUT_ZONES_SOURCE-N FORWARD_direct-N FWDI_public-N FWDI_public_allow-N FWDI_public_deny-N FWDI_public_log-N FWDI_trusted-N…